To the Conservatives Who Hate Welfare

I once had some friends[1] who were your typical Rush Limbaugh-loving conservatives who loved to complain about welfare programs. CNBC offers a nice slide show on your tax dollars at work. It basically breaks down like this:

42% - Military
22% - Healthcare
10% - National Debt
8% - Anti-Poverty programs
4% - Education and social services
4% - Law enforcement
3% - HUD
3% - DOE, Environment, Science
1.5% - Agriculture

So let’s say welfare programs as we know them are split between social services and anti-poverty programs. Let’s be generous and say welfare programs take up 5% of your tax dollar. So if you gave the US $1,000 in taxes, that means you spent $50 on welfare programs. I realize $50 is a lot of money for something you hate, but when the money is pooled, can’t you just pretend you didn’t spend that $50 on welfare and that I gave $100 for it? Does it really matter that much to you?

1.) They are no longer my friends because when I repeatedly requested that they not send me pro-Bush, pro-Iraq War emails, they did not stop doing so. I told them I would block their email addresses if they continued, and they did, so I blocked them and have not spoken to them since 2004 or so. I wonder what they think of Bush, Saddam, WMDs, etc., now.

3 Responses to “To the Conservatives Who Hate Welfare”

  1. katie Says:

    not to mention “corporate welfare” which costs us all Much more!
    i read in the atlanta paper today that 61% of corporations didnt pay federal taxes this year, due to bailouts, incentive programs, etc etc etc.

    where’e the outrage about That?!

  2. Melissa Says:

    Katie beat me to it. Corporate welfare.

  3. .:Colter:. » Blog Archive » What Does 700 Billion Mean To You? | Brooklyn blog, New York, Carroll Gardens, Gowanus, Red Hook, Colter McCorkindale Says:

    [...] next time you hear anyone complain about welfare spending for the poor, remember that’s only $50 of your annual taxes. So one silver lining to this debacle is that we’ll never have to hear the argument against [...]

Leave a Reply